radar:radarequation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| radar:radarequation [2018/06/08 15:51] – [Derivation of Radar Equation] sidoretti | radar:radarequation [2026/04/28 15:13] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ======Radar Equation====== | ======Radar Equation====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In this chapter we will show how the basic radar equation is derived, that describes the conditions under which a target can be detected by a radar. We say " | ||
| =====Derivation of Radar Equation===== | =====Derivation of Radar Equation===== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
| <figure farnearfields> | <figure farnearfields> | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| </ | </ | ||
| - | The antenna directivity is the ratio between the power density measured in a certain point in space and the power density | + | The antenna directivity is the ratio between the power density measured in a certain point in space and the power density |
| \begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
| Line 196: | Line 198: | ||
| <figure fig-2.2> | <figure fig-2.2> | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| < | < | ||
| )]</ | )]</ | ||
| Line 257: | Line 259: | ||
| ^ Reality $\downarrow$ | ^ Reality $\downarrow$ | ||
| | $H_1$ | OK | Missed Detection ($1-p_D$) | | | $H_1$ | OK | Missed Detection ($1-p_D$) | | ||
| - | | $H_1$ | False Alarm ($p_{fa}$) | + | | $H_0$ | False Alarm ($p_{fa}$) |
| < | < | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 268: | Line 270: | ||
| <figure fig-2.3> | <figure fig-2.3> | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| < | < | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 335: | Line 337: | ||
| \end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
| - | $S_{min}$ is the minimum signal needed to detect the target with given $p_D$ and $p_{fa}$. $S_{min}$ can be expressed | + | $S_{min}$ is the minimum signal needed to detect the target with given $p_D$ and $p_{fa}$. $S_{min}$ can be expressed |
| <figure fig-2.4> | <figure fig-2.4> | ||
| Line 408: | Line 410: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | If the range is not known, there is an iterative procedure that can be used for the attenuation. | + | If the range is not known, there is an iterative procedure that can be used to compute |
| -If we have a constant specific attenuation $\alpha(R)$ (dB/Km), the attenuation factor is $A(R) = 10^{-\alpha R}$; | -If we have a constant specific attenuation $\alpha(R)$ (dB/Km), the attenuation factor is $A(R) = 10^{-\alpha R}$; | ||
| - | -The range is first computed using the radar equation without attenuation, | + | -The range is first computed using the radar equation without attenuation, |
| - | -The 2-way attenuation $A_0 = 10^{-2\alpha R_0}$ is computed considering the range R_0 (in this case the range is too great, so the attenuation will be higher than reality too), R_1 is then computed by substituting the new attenuation factor $A_0$ in the radar equation; | + | -The 2-way attenuation $A_0 = 10^{-2\alpha R_0}$ is computed considering the range $R_0$ (in this case the range is too great, so the attenuation will be higher than reality too), $R_1$ is then computed by substituting the new attenuation factor $A_0$ in the radar equation; |
| -$A_1$ is computed again using the new range $R_1$; | -$A_1$ is computed again using the new range $R_1$; | ||
| -iterate until $R_i \approx R_{i+1}$. | -iterate until $R_i \approx R_{i+1}$. | ||
| - | The convergence of the results to an acceptable value is usually fast, after 2 or 3 iterations the obtained values can be considered | + | The convergence of the results to an acceptable value is usually fast, after 2 or 3 iterations the obtained values can be considered |
| The noise captured by the antenna also depends on other phenomena in the atmosphere and on cosmic sources. In general, this noise is characterized by simply giving an antenna noise temperature $T_a$, from which the noise power can be computed as $kT_a$ (being $k$ the Boltzmann constant). This under the assumptions that the antenna is ideal, with no losses, and that the radiation pattern has no lobes pointing on the ground. Figure {{ref> | The noise captured by the antenna also depends on other phenomena in the atmosphere and on cosmic sources. In general, this noise is characterized by simply giving an antenna noise temperature $T_a$, from which the noise power can be computed as $kT_a$ (being $k$ the Boltzmann constant). This under the assumptions that the antenna is ideal, with no losses, and that the radiation pattern has no lobes pointing on the ground. Figure {{ref> | ||
| Line 487: | Line 489: | ||
| \end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
| - | $T_E$ is the noise produced by the device, comparing the equations (54) and (57) such noise can becomes: $\Delta P_{on} = GkT_EB$. This is the temperature referred to the input terminals of the device, if the noise power in input has a temperature $T_1$, the overall device noise temperature will be $T_1+T_E$. Hence the noise power: | + | $T_E$ characterizes |
| \begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
| Line 679: | Line 681: | ||
| ===Over The Horizon Backscattering (OTH-B)=== | ===Over The Horizon Backscattering (OTH-B)=== | ||
| - | At low frequencies (HF band), signals directed to the sky with a certain angle are reflected by the ionosphere (where the refractive index changes) towards the ground The OTH-B radar can detect signals backscattered from the target back to the ionosphere and reflected again towards the receiver (see Figure {{ref> | + | At low frequencies (HF band), signals directed to the sky with a certain angle are reflected by the ionosphere (where the refractive index changes) towards the ground. The OTH-B radar can detect signals backscattered from the target back to the ionosphere and reflected again towards the receiver (see Figure {{ref> |
| <figure fig-2.31> | <figure fig-2.31> | ||
| Line 697: | Line 699: | ||
| <figure duga> | <figure duga> | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| </ | </ | ||
| Note that there are two different arrays, one is used as a transmitter and the other as a receiver. The power used by OTH-B radars can reach the order of few MegaWatts (10 MW in the case of the Duga). Those radars could only be built when the technology permitted the development of Doppler radars (see [[http:// | Note that there are two different arrays, one is used as a transmitter and the other as a receiver. The power used by OTH-B radars can reach the order of few MegaWatts (10 MW in the case of the Duga). Those radars could only be built when the technology permitted the development of Doppler radars (see [[http:// | ||
| - | One important characteristic of OTH-B radars is the poor resolution. Nowadays these radars are only used when precision is not needed, being less expensive than satellites. OTH-B radars built during the cold war instead, were built because there was no better technology at the time, now for such military purposes, the use of satellites has made radars like the Duga obsolete. | + | One important characteristic of OTH-B radars is the poor resolution. Nowadays these radars are only used when precision is not needed, being less expensive than satellites. OTH-B radars built during the cold war, instead, were built because there was no better technology at the time, now for such military purposes, the use of satellites has made radars like the Duga obsolete. |
| - | Another way of exploiting the change of refractive index id the conduct effect (Figure {{ref> | + | Another way of exploiting the change of refractive index is the conduct effect (Figure {{ref> |
| <figure fig-2.35> | <figure fig-2.35> | ||
| Line 720: | Line 722: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | This radar is mainly used for marine applications, | + | This radar is mainly used for marine applications, |
radar/radarequation.1528473107.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
