RadarLab

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • thanks • radardetection • radar • introduction • rcs • exercises
radar:doppler

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

radar:doppler [2018/06/04 17:50] – masrourradar:doppler [2026/04/28 15:13] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 35: Line 35:
 <figure label> <figure label>
  {{ :media:figure_2.radar.png?500x500 }}  {{ :media:figure_2.radar.png?500x500 }}
-<caption> Doppler Effect [(cite:image1>> title: https://www.texasgateway.org ,section:Wave behaviour:the doppler effect ,publisher:Texas Education Agency 1701 ,published:2007+<caption> Doppler Effect [(cite:image1>>title: https://www.texasgateway.org ,section:Wave behaviour:the doppler effect ,publisher:Texas Education Agency 1701 ,published:2007
 )] </caption> )] </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 247: Line 247:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:new_cw.png?400x400 }} {{ :media:new_cw.png?400x400 }}
-<caption> (upper . Fig) Simple CW radar block diagram ; (lower. Fig) response characteristic of beat-frequency amplifier [(cite:Image8>> title: http://nptel.ac.in/courses/101108056/module2/lecture4.pdf, section:Cw Radar:Doppler frequency shift,publisher:nptel  +<caption> (upper . Fig) Simple CW radar block diagram ; (lower. Fig) response characteristic of beat-frequency amplifier [(cite:Image8>> title: http://nptel.ac.in/courses/101108056/module2/lecture4.pdf ,section:Cw-Radar,Doppler frequency shift,publisher:nptel)] </caption>
-)] </caption>+
 </figure> </figure>
  
Line 939: Line 938:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:dsp_respo.png?400 }} {{ :media:dsp_respo.png?400 }}
-<caption>MTI doppler filter bank resulting from the processing of N = $8$ pulses [(#13)]</caption>+<caption>MTI doppler filter bank resulting from the processing of N = $8$ pulses [(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
-For comparison, the improvement factor for an N-pulse canceller is shown in the next $Fig$. +For comparison, the improvement factor for an N-pulse canceller is shown in $Fig.40$. 
   * Note that the improvement factor of a two-pulse canceler is almost as good as that of the $8$-pulse doppler-filter bank. The three-pulse canceler is even better. ( Maximizing the average improvement factor might not be the only criterion used in judging the effectiveness of MTI doppler processors.)   * Note that the improvement factor of a two-pulse canceler is almost as good as that of the $8$-pulse doppler-filter bank. The three-pulse canceler is even better. ( Maximizing the average improvement factor might not be the only criterion used in judging the effectiveness of MTI doppler processors.)
  
Line 948: Line 947:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:filter_b.png?400 }} {{ :media:filter_b.png?400 }}
-<caption>Improvement factor for each filter of an $8$-pulse doppler filter bank with uniform weighting as a function of the clutter spectral width (standard deviation). The average improvement for all filters is indicated by the dotted curve.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption>Improvement factor for each filter of an $8$-pulse doppler filter bank with uniform weighting as a function of the clutter spectral width (standard deviation). The average improvement for all filters is indicated by the dotted curve.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
Line 955: Line 954:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:npulse_filtro.png?400 }} {{ :media:npulse_filtro.png?400 }}
-<caption> Improvement factor for an N-pulse delay-line canceler with optimum weights (solid curves) and binomial weights (dashed curves), as a function of the clutter spectral width.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption> Improvement factor for an N-pulse delay-line canceler with optimum weights (solid curves) and binomial weights (dashed curves), as a function of the clutter spectral width.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
Line 967: Line 966:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:double_clutter.png?300x300 }} {{ :media:double_clutter.png?300x300 }}
-<caption> Improvement factor for a $3$-pulse (double-canceler) MTI cascaded with an 8-pulse doppler filter hank. or integrator.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption> Improvement factor for a $3$-pulse (double-canceler) MTI cascaded with an 8-pulse doppler filter hank or integrator.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
Line 977: Line 976:
  
  
 +
 +
 +===== Moving Target Detector =====
  
  
Line 995: Line 997:
  
  
-The input on the left is from the output of the $I$ and $Q$ A/D converters. The use of a three-pulse canceler ahead of the fi1ter: bank eliminates stationary clutter and thereby reduces the dynamic range required of the doppler filter-bank.+The input on the left is from the output of the $I$ and $Q$ A/D converters. The use of a three-pulse canceler ahead of the filter: bank eliminates stationary clutter and thereby reduces the dynamic range required of the doppler filter-bank.
  
  
Line 1005: Line 1007:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:prf_radio.png?300 }} {{ :media:prf_radio.png?300 }}
-<caption> Detection of aircraft in rain using two prf's with a doppler filter bank.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption> Detection of aircraft in rain using two prf's with a doppler filter bank.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
Line 1014: Line 1016:
  
  
-**Limitation of MTI Performance**+**Limitation to MTI Performance**
  
  
Line 1021: Line 1023:
  
  
-  * **MTI Improvement Factor** ($I_C$) : + * **MTI Improvement Factor** ($I_C$) : 
  
 The signal-to-clutter ratio at the output of the MTI system divided by the signal-to-clutter ratio at the input averaged uniformly over all target radial velocities of interest. (discussed earlier) The signal-to-clutter ratio at the output of the MTI system divided by the signal-to-clutter ratio at the input averaged uniformly over all target radial velocities of interest. (discussed earlier)
  
-  * **Subclutter Visibility** ($SCV$):+ * **Subclutter Visibility** ($SCV$):
  
 The ratio by which a signal may be weaker than the coincident clutter and can be detected with the specified $P_d$ and $P_{fa}$. All radial velocities assumed equally likely. The ratio by which a signal may be weaker than the coincident clutter and can be detected with the specified $P_d$ and $P_{fa}$. All radial velocities assumed equally likely.
Line 1031: Line 1033:
 $SCV = (C/S)_{in}$ $SCV = (C/S)_{in}$
  
-  * **Clutter Visibility Factor ($V_{OC}$)** :+ * **Clutter Visibility Factor ($V_{OC}$)** :
      
 The Signal to Clutter ratio after filtering that provides the specified $P_d$ and $P_{fa}$. The Signal to Clutter ratio after filtering that provides the specified $P_d$ and $P_{fa}$.
Line 1089: Line 1091:
 <figure label> <figure label>
  {{ :media:lim_mti.png?200 }}  {{ :media:lim_mti.png?200 }}
-<caption> Power spectra of various clutter targets.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption> Power spectra of various clutter targets.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
Line 1160: Line 1162:
  
  
-A plot of $Eq.32$ for the double canceler is shown in $Fig.39$ The parameter describing the curves is ${f_p}λ $. Example PRF's and frequencies are shown. Several "representative" examples of clutter are indicated, based on published data for $σ_v$, which for the most part dates back to World War II +A plot of $Eq.39$ for the double canceler is shown in $Fig.45$ The parameter describing the curves is ${f_p}λ $. Example PRF's and frequencies are shown. Several "representative" examples of clutter are indicated, based on published data for $σ_v$, which for the most part dates back to World War II 
  
  
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:omega.png?430 }} {{ :media:omega.png?430 }}
-<caption>Plot of double-canceler clutter improvement factor [(#13)]</caption>+<caption>Plot of double-canceler clutter improvement factor [(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
  
-Its a Plot of double-canceler clutter improvement factor [Eq.$32$] as a function of $σ_c$ = rms velocity spread of the clutter. The parameter is the product of the pulse repetition frequency ($f_p$) and the radar wavelength ($λ$).+Its a Plot of double-canceler clutter improvement factor [Eq.$39$] as a function of $σ_c$ = rms velocity spread of the clutter. The parameter is the product of the pulse repetition frequency ($f_p$) and the radar wavelength ($λ$).
  
  
Line 1191: Line 1193:
  
 \begin{equation} \begin{equation}
-G(θ) = G_0  exp [\frac{ - 2.776{θ}^2 }{ {θ_B}^2} ]   +G(θ) = G_0  exp [-{\frac{ 2.7726{θ}^2 }{ {θ_B}^2}} ]   
 \end{equation} \end{equation}
  
Line 1199: Line 1201:
  
 \begin{equation} \begin{equation}
-S_a = G_0  exp [\frac{ - 2.776({θ/ \dot{\theta }_s})^2 }{ (\frac{θ_B}{\dot{\theta }_s})^2} ]   +S_a = G_0  exp [-{\frac{  2.7726({θ/ \dot{\theta }_s})^2 }{ (\frac{θ_B}{\dot{\theta }_s})^2}} ]   
 \end{equation} \end{equation}
  
Line 1208: Line 1210:
  
 \begin{equation} \begin{equation}
-S_a = K  exp [\frac{ - 2.776 {t^2} }{ {t_0}^2} ] = K_1 exp [ \frac{{-π^2}{f^2}{t_0}^2}{ 2.776 }]  +S_a = K  exp [-{\frac{  2.7726 {t^2} }{ {t_0}^2} }] = K_1 exp [-{ \frac{{π^2}{f^2}{t_0}^2}{ 2.7726 }}]  
 \end{equation} \end{equation}
  
  
-where $K$ = constant. Since this is a Gaussian function, the exponent is of the form $ f^2 /2{σ_f}^2 $; where $σ_f$ = standard deviation. Therefore+where $K$ = $4ln2= 2.7726$. Since this is a Gaussian function, the exponent is of the form $ f^2 /2{σ_f}^2 $; where $σ_f$ = standard deviation. Therefore
  
  
Line 1229: Line 1231:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{ :media:gaussian_shape.png?430 }} {{ :media:gaussian_shape.png?430 }}
-<caption> Limitation to improvement factor due to a scanning antenna. Antenna pattern assumed to be of gaussian shape.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption> Limitation to improvement factor due to a scanning antenna. Antenna pattern assumed to be of gaussian shape.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
  
Line 1248: Line 1250:
 <figure label> <figure label>
 {{:media:a11.png?311 }}{{ :media:b11.png?340}} {{:media:a11.png?311 }}{{ :media:b11.png?340}}
-<caption> Effect of limit level on the improvement factor for ($a$) two-pulse delay-line canceler and ($b$) three-pulse delay-line canceler. C/L = ratio of rms clutter power to limit level.[(#13)]</caption>+<caption> Effect of limit level on the improvement factor for ($a$) two-pulse delay-line canceler and ($b$) three-pulse delay-line canceler. $C/L$ = ratio of RMS clutter power to limit level.[(cite:Image9)]</caption>
  </figure>  </figure>
 +
  
  
Line 1257: Line 1260:
  
 When the MTI improvement factor is not great enough to reduce the clutter sufficiently..the clutter residue will appear on the display and prevent the detection of aircraft targets whose cross sections are larger than the clutter residue.  When the MTI improvement factor is not great enough to reduce the clutter sufficiently..the clutter residue will appear on the display and prevent the detection of aircraft targets whose cross sections are larger than the clutter residue. 
-Whereby setting the limit level $ L$, relative to the noise $ N$, equal to the MTI improvement factor $I$ or $L/N = 1$. If the limit level relative to noise is set higher than the improvement factor. clutter residue obscures part of the display and If it is set too low there may be a " black hole " effect on the display. The limiter provides a constant false alarm rate **(CFAR)** and is essential to usable MTI performance.+Whereby setting the limit level $L$, relative to the noise $N$, equal to the MTI improvement factor $I$ or $L/N = 1$. If the limit level relative to noise is set higher than the improvement factor. clutter residue obscures part of the display and If it is set too low there may be a " black hole " effect on the display. The limiter provides a **C**onstant **F**alse **A**larm **R**ate (**CFAR**)[(A **false alarm** is “an erroneous radar target detection decision caused by noise or other interfering signals exceeding the detection threshold”. In general, it is an indication of the presence of a radar target when there is no valid aim. The False Alarm Rate (FAR) is calculated using the following formula: $FAR=\frac{false targets per PRT}{Number of rangecells}$)] and is essential to usable MTI performance.
 Unfortunately, nonlinear devices such as limiters have side-effects that can degrade performance. Unfortunately, nonlinear devices such as limiters have side-effects that can degrade performance.
  
  
-An example of the effect of limiting is shown in the Figure, which plots the improvement factor for two-pulse and three-pulse cancelers within various levels of limiting. The abscissa applies to a Gaussian clutter spectrum that is generated either by clutter motion with standard deviation $ σ_v$, at a wavelength $λ$ and a prf $f_p $, or by antenna scanning modulation with a Gaussian-shaped beam and $n_B$ pulses between the half-power beamwidth of the one-way antenna pattern. The parameter $C/L$ is the ratio of the RMS clutter power to the receiver-IF limit level.+An example of the effect of limiting is shown in the $Fig.47$, which plots the improvement factor for two-pulse and three-pulse cancelers within various levels of limiting. The abscissa applies to a Gaussian clutter spectrum that is generated either by clutter motion with standard deviation $ σ_v$, at a wavelength $λ$ and a prf $f_p $, or by antenna scanning modulation with a Gaussian-shaped beam and $n_B$ pulses between the half-power beamwidth of the one-way antenna pattern. The parameter $C/L$ is the ratio of the RMS clutter power to the receiver-IF limit level.
  
  
 The loss of improvement factor increases with increasing complexity of the canceler. The loss of improvement factor increases with increasing complexity of the canceler.
-Thus the added complexity of higher-order cancelers is seldom justified in such situations. The linear analysis of MTI signal processors is therefore not adequate when limiting & employed and can lead to disappointing differences between theory and measurement of actual systems.+Thus the added complexity of higher-order cancelers is not often justified in such situations. The linear analysis of MTI signal processors is therefore not enough when limiting & employed and can lead to disappointing differences between theory and measurement of actual systems.
  
  
Line 1272: Line 1275:
  
  
 +**Termination of Moving Target Detection**
 +
 +
 +
 +The **M**oving **T**arget **D**etector, as we discussed earlier ,is able to optimize mobile targets in the presence of white addictive and clutter or improves target resolution.
 +
 +The output of the receiver is a signal, which contains the required target plus various forms of noise and clutter. In the case of the MTI output, this clutter residue is the result of imperfect cancellation due to various factors such as equipment instability, antenna modulation, lack of dynamic range or Doppler content within the clutter itself. The detection process separates the required target from the noise and clutter. Detectors are normally designed to carry out this process with a constant false alarm rate (CFAR).
 +
 +The diagram shows the location of the detector in the chain of signal processing. This device forms the information on a point like target as a digital report. The up to this point existing information about the analog value (or digital description of) of the received power in a particular binary cell will be transformed to information about the coordinates of a target. The value of the power is included in this report mostly.
 +
 +The important procedure is, that up to this point all binary cells (containing the received power) must be processed. After the detector exist only reports about selected binary cells. However, there may exist several reports about a single target, generated by adjacent binary cells. This will processed in the next device.
 +
 +
 +
 +<figure label>
 +{{ :media:termination_of_mti_mtd.png?500 }}
 +<caption> Part of block diagram(information flow)[(cite:Image3)]</caption>
 + </figure>
 +
 +
 +
 +Until now its simply discused about MTI performance limitiation ,MTD device operation and using different filters or transformation.deeper discussion on the Doppler frequency and adaptive thresholds on the different filters ,etc. __is presented in__ 
  
-More information is presented in **Modern Radar System Analysis** by **David K.Barton** chapter $6$.+    *  **Modern Radar System Analysis**, Author: David K.Barton ,chapter $6$ .  
 +    *  **Advanced radar techniques and systems**, Author: Gaspare Galati ,chapter $12$ . 
radar/doppler.1528134656.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)